Subramanium, can be composed through a merely voice explaining plurality of thought. That application was also dismissed on March 16, 1956. Any member of Indian Legal Service holding a Grade-I Post for three years can be a substitute for a High Court Judge. 1148 of 2010 1) This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 06. He would submit the instant poem is one where there is transference of consciousness that exposes the social hypocrisy and it cannot be perceived with a conditioned mind.

2011 passed by the learned single Judge of the High Court (hereinafter called as the trial court) in CS(OS)No. " Seen the complaint filed to day against the accused Narayandas Bhagwandas Madhavdas under section 8(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act read with Section 23B thereof read with Section 19 of the Sea Customs Act and Notification No. Section 50 of that Act provided that a person who is, or has been, or is qualified to be, a Judge of a High Supreme Court of India Lawyer, or a person who is, or has been, a member of the India Legal Service and is holding or has held a post in Grade I of that service for at least three years could be appointed as the Presiding Officer.

2012 passed by the High Court of judicature of Delhi at New Delhi (the First Appellate Court) in Regular First Appeal (OS) No. 2005 passed by the learned single Judge of the High Court in favour of the appellant herein in Suit No. Jurisdiction of court over matters arising under this Chapter. Laxmibai told Champutai that she was going to Bombay and if she was able to come back in time, she would attend the party. on November 12, Laxmibai went to Virkar, who was a tenant of the house where she lived, and informed him that she was going to Bombay by the night train to consult a doctor and requested him to pay Rs.

41 of 2011, whereby the First Appellate Court has confirmed the judgment and decree dated 21. Laxmibai told him that she proposed to go to Bombay with the appellant for consulting Dr. Sathe for her health and that she would be returning in four or five days. Poetry, which is a great liberator, submits Mr. 2008 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No. The appellant had fixed up an engagement with Dr.

This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 31. 5 We may next refer to Information Technology Act, 2000 which provided for establishment of Cyber Appellate Tribunal with a single member. 1414 of 1979 for specific performance of the agreement dated 19. 245 of 2006 in Suit No. 2172 of 2003 and dismissed the suit filed by the appellant. On November 25, 1955, the appellant filed a petition, numbered Writ Petition 209-D of 1955 in the Punjab High Court in which he prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ for quashing the orders dated September 7, 1955, and October 11, 1955, and asked for an order directing his reinstatement as Assistant Station Director in the External Services Division of the All India Radio, the post which he was holding when the orders complained of were passed.

-- (1) Every suit or other civil proceeding arising under this Chapter in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right conferred by this Act shall be instituted in the district court having jurisdiction. In this appeal, the appellant has questioned the correctness of the impugned judgment and order urging various facts and legal contentions and prayed for granting of the decree of partition of her share in the ˜B suit schedule property.

Thereupon, the appellant moved this Court for Special Leave and obtained such leave on April 23, 1956. The appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment is hereby set aside. About the same time Champutai, daughter of Bhave mentioned earlier, came to Laxmibai's house to invite her to attend the birthday party of her son which had been fixed for November 13. 2004 has not applied the law correctly. 1414 of 1979 whereby the High Court allowed the appeal filed by respondents herein while setting aside the decree dated 12.

On November 10 or 11, she saw a lawyer Karandikar, also a relation, and informed him that she intended to go to Bombay with the appellant for consulting a physician. Judged therefore from the view point of the Law firms in Supreme Court discussed in this judgment, it is clear that the cryptic judgment dated 18. Sathe of Bombay, who has been named earlier, for November 13, 1956, at 3 p. That is, the requirement of even a Secretary level officer is gone. While moving the application for special leave, learned counsel for the appellant stated that without prejudice to the contentions of either party, the appellant would take up the posts of Assistant Information Officer in the Press Information Bureau pending disposal of the appeal.

The High Court has, vide the impugned judgment and order, elaborately dealt with the entire evidence on record and extensively discussed the judgment and order of the Sessions Supreme Court of India Advocate in order to ascertain the correctness or otherwise of the conviction and sentence awarded to the accused-appellants. for examining Laxmibai. We do not find any merit in these appeals, hence, the appeals fail and are hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. 105/51 dated the 27th February, 1951, as amended, issued by the Reserve Bank of India under Section 8(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act.

This petition was summarily dismissed by the Punjab High Court on the same date. Seen the letter of authority. The appellant then 13O4 moved the said High Court for a certificate for leave to appeal to this Court. 31) In view of the above, we are of the considered opinion that the High Court was right in setting aside the decree passed by learned single Judge of the High Court. On November 8, 1956, Bhave, a relation of Laxmibai, called on Laxmibai and found the appellant there.

The appellant refused to accept the lower post of Assistant Press Information Officer and on October 19, 1955, he made over charge under protest.