We proceed now to consider the legal difficulties which according to learned counsel for the respondent stand in the way of treating the limestone quarry and the factory as one establishment. In scrutinising the evidence of the plaintiff and of Jadunath it must be borne in mind that the case of the plaintiff is that on January 2, 1944, certain information having been received by him, he performed the formalities. This will require the Court to consider the different aspects of a government advertisement campaign highlighted earlier on which we have reserved our comments.

The learned author also says that " If a municipality stipulates in a contract with a water or other public service company that it shall have the- right to purchase the works of the company at a time and in a (1) Dillon's "Municipal Corporations", 5th Ed. That chapter was inserted by the Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1953 (43 of 1953), which came into effect from October 24, 1953. The said order no doubt gave an opportunity to the appellants to pay the decretal a-mount in the manner prescribed by it but it clearly provided that in default of the appellants complying with the said conditions within the respective due dates the sale of the property by the receiver to respondent 2 be confirmed and that the said receiver do make over possession of the said property to the said purchaser.

2000 to TONIC CLONIC 27. It is a composite order. It is necessary to refer briefly to the scheme and object of lay-off compensation and the disqualifications therefor as envisaged by the relevant provisions in Chapter VA of the Act. , on May 9, 1958, was a conditional order. 2000 AMRITSAR MH AMRITSAR 22. The question of the purchase of works of companies by municipality is also considered by Dillon: " Where a municipal corporation has granted a franchise to a water or gas company to construct its plant, to use the city streets for pipes and mains, and to furnish water or light to the city and its inhabitants, it has been held that the legislature under special constitutional restrictions was without authority to compel the city to purchase the property or plant of the company if it desired to acquire or construct works of its own; but in the absence of constitutional limitations statutes may be enacted and contracts made which in their effect prevent municipalities from establishing water works of their own until they have at least offered to purchase the works of corporations organised and existing within their limits " (3).

The judgment-debtor then applied for setting aside, modifying or reviewing the said order. It is also apposite to mention here that the orders have been assailed by the Gram Panchayat as well as by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (for short, ˜the Corporation), for both had preferred the intra-court appeal assailing the award of the Labour Court as well as the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge.

2000 SEIZURE-345 NEUROTIC 18. It provided for the payment of the decretal amount by the appellants and in that sense gave an opportunity to the appellants to avoid the sale of their property but, on the other hand, it also provided that on their default to comply with the order the sale do stand confirmed and the receiver do make over the possession of the property to the purchaser. Sanyal contends that the sale in the present case being conditional in the sense that it was subject to the confirmation by the court it was open to the court to refuse to confirm it when the appellants applied for leave to pay the balance of the decretal amount.

Publication of the photograph of an individual be a State or party functionary not only has the tendency of associating that particular individual with either the achievement(s) sought to be highlighted or being the architect of the benefits in respect of which information is sought to be percolated. , also said much to the same effect, at P. The first is with regard to publication of photographs of functionaries of the State and political leaders alonwith the advertisement issued.

" But then comes sect. 2000 CHANDIMANDIR CH(WC) 12. Therefore, in our opinion, there is no scope for applying the principle laid down by Woodroffe, J. This argument necessarily assumes that the order passed by Mitter, J. , held that a court had inherent power to deal with an application to set aside an order made ex parte, on a proper case being substantiated. In our opinion this assumption is not well-founded. It is clear that this order is not a conditional order at all.

It appears that when disputes arose between the decreeholder and the judgment-debtor in regard to the performance of the conditions imposed by the decree the decreeholder obtained an order for ejectment of the defendant without notice to the judgment-debtor. II, which, I think, if more was needed, makes the adjudication conclusive on third persons that the act of bankruptcy on which it was founded was really committed. There can be no manner of doubt that one government advertisement or the other coinciding with some event or occasion is published practically every day.

The Tribunal has merely hinted at these difficulties by saying that an anomalous position will arise if the quarry and the factory are treated as one establishment. 2001 DEPRESSION-300 CHANDIMANDIR Give particulars of any diseases, wounds or injuries from which you are suffering Illness, First Started Where treated Approximate dates and period Wound, treated Injury Date Place GENERALISED 22. Be that as it may, as the Panchayat has preferred the appeal, it requires to be addressed on merits.

206 conditional decree which entitled the decreeholder, on the default of the defendant, to apply to the court which passed the decree to direct the ejectment of the defend ant.